Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Veterans Day 2009

Veterans Day is here again and I've worn my dog tags outside of my shirt where others can see them. Hopefully their presence will encourage people to remember this special day to honor the veterans that served their country. I recall those I served with -- for them and those that came before or serve now I have great reverence and respect. We are a band of brothers that I'm proud to belong to. I'm still filled with pride whenever I see the American flag -- proud to be an American. Waves of sadness come over me for the psychological harm caused by my fellow Americans that treated solders returning from Vietnam with disrespect and in some cases hate. Sadly, disrespect of the military still exists in far to many Americans. These days it's hidden under the surface of the politically correct mantra and lie "I support our troops." Patriotism has somehow become self anointed and not earned.

A while back two soldiers, disabled by their war wounds, were interviewed on "The Factor." O'Reilly asked them how they were being treated by their fellow countrymen. He clearly remembered what happened to those in the Vietnam era. Both veterans praised their supporters but when supporters were named they were the VFW and the American Legion -- veterans all. Why only veterans? I couldn't help but to cry for them and yes, for myself.

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Health Care Delivery

I have a patient's perspective. Not being a medical professional, my comments are based on personal observations over my lifetime. Having experienced heath care change over the last fifty plus years I have some insights into health care delivery that others may not have.

In my earliest recollections of health care delivery there were single doctor offices and doctors made house calls. When you went to an ER the first question asked was do you have Blue Cross Blue Shield. ER's had yet to be ruled by the government as unfunded free clinics to the poor and illegal aliens.

Location determines what health care is available. When in the USAF I was overseas at a small base. When I had a small cavity they pulled the tooth instead of filling it. They also misdiagnosed allergies as a sinus condition and gave me pills to treat the symptoms. After discharge from the USAF I went to work for a large company that had a nurse's office which dealt with basic care not requiring a doctor. For example, the company nurse gave me weekly injections prescribed by my allergist. The allergies the military doctor in Germany said I didn't have. In some cases health insurance was fully covered by employers but less so over time.

As doctors trended from general practice to specialties small groups banded together to share an office and administrative costs. More medical services were offered on site and health care delivery was clinic run. They naturally delivered services they were trained for even if not necessarily well practiced in. Referrals were after all lost revenue. You might say they rationed care according to what they could deliver. One of these clinics performed out patient surgery to remove a fatty tumor from the back of my head. They didn't get it all so it grew back over time and another clinic operated. Like the first, they didn't remove it all and again it grew back.

I changed jobs after my wife became pregnant and learned about preexisting condition coverage. My new insurer wouldn't cover prenatal care, the delivery or my wifes hospital stay. Needless to say I had to come up with thousands of dollars which I didn't have. The hospital refused to release my wife and new son until I paid. I called their bluff, while at the desk of the collection person that was threatening me, I called the FBI to report an abduction. I was so angry I refused to make a specific payment arrangement just to make their life difficult. Unknown to them was my plan to pay as much as I could every payday until the bill was paid.

With a new job and this time a state residence change came a forced change of health insurance provider. Government regulations dictate you must purchase insurance in the state you live which limits competitive choices and punishes you with preexisting condition limits. I had a preexisting condition and the company offered insurance plans wouldn't cover me until after a long waiting period. I had little choice but to enroll in an HMO that had no preexisting condition limitations. This large HMO had a statewide network of clinics and hospitals which gave me better access to specialists and lab facilities, all of their choice. Remember the fatty tumor, this time it was removed by a very experienced surgeon and never grew back. Waits for getting an appointment were much longer and always resulted in long lines and waiting when you came for your scheduled appointment. In my 50's my Aortic heart value started to malfunction and only worked at 50% efficiency. Less than a month after diagnosis my valve was replaced with a mechanical one. Over time my blood pressure became more difficult to control and I ended up on four different blood pressure medications at the same time. I became potassium deficient and saw an HMO specialist that diagnosed me with hyperaldosteronism. Aldosterone is a hormone secreted by the adrenal glands. They put me on huge potassium pills. What I didn't realize at the time was that my care had been rationed for the HMO to save cost. Drugs were the only option offered and the link to high blood pressure was never explained.

As a war time veteran I'm eligible for VA health care. In my case a co-payment is required for delivered services. After retiring I decided to sign up with the VA -- the HMO wanted a thousand dollars a month for my wife and I. They effectively price the insured out of coverage when they get older. I then relocated to be near the VA hospital in Fresno CA. The VA also diagnosed my Aldosterone problem but instead of medicating the symptoms they fixed it. The cause was a tumor in an adrenal gland and the VA performed the surgery to remove it at the San Francisco VA Hospital. My potassium level and blood pressure returned to normal. Clearly the cure that was best for my long term health. Routine appointments can take thirty days to get, there is waiting at the blood draw lab and waiting at the pharmacy. However if I feel I need faster attention there is always the VA's ER. I should note that the VA ER is only available to veterans. I went to the VA ER after I passed out and awoke on the bathroom floor. The ER did a CT scan of my head and found I had bleeding on the brain. They arranged for a neurosurgeon and sent me via ambulance 170 miles to his location at the Palo Alto VA hospital. The next morning my surgery was performed -- no waiting involved.

Many of the health care providers at the VA are veterans themselves. We share a common bond and a military sense of duty. Like the HMO, the VA prescribes from an approved formulary of drugs. You will get generics when available which lowers the cost to the VA or HMO. I can say that the VA prescribed more modern drugs for my type 2 Diabetes than the HMO did. One of the VA's prescriptions was even for a non-generic. The VA also has what may be the only nationwide 100% electronic health care records system and provides Internet based health information, personal record keeping and prescription renewal. I found the VA superior to the HMO in every way. They have always provided me with the most effective heath care -- not the cheap way out. Northern CA is said to have the best regional VA system in the country. No doubt the level of care and number of facilities varies in other parts of the country depending on population density and closeness to top medical schools.

There are many factors that have increased the cost of health insurance. I've already mentioned the prohibition on purchasing health insurance across state lines. The government also mandates what is covered so the customer can't choose and balance cost based on their own needs and ability to pay. Did you know that a drug developed by a US pharmaceutical company costs more in the US than let's say Canada. Our government makes sure we can't buy our drugs from Canada where they are cheaper. I for example wouldn't purchase mental health coverage. Tax treatment has made employers the default source of health insurance further limiting your choice of insurer to those selected by your employer. Individuals pay at higher rates for insurance and sometimes higher rates to hospitals if they have no insurance. It would be much better if individuals directly purchased their insurance from any of the 3,000 plus insurers in the US. There is plenty of competition if only the government allowed it to take place. Forced loss of coverage for preexisting conditions would be under the individuals control where it belongs.

I've never participated in a Socialized Public Option and hope I never have to. When examining socialized medicine in other countries I find they provide a much lower level of service and care than even the HMO I belonged to does. Months of waiting to see a specialist can be a death sentence. For example in the UK the death rate from breast cancer is much greater than in the US. Government does a poor job of running business and health care is one business we can't afford to let them mismanage. The farther away from the patients and doctors the rationing rules are made the more disconnected from the patient they will be. Formula's that devalue older individuals and ration care to them aren't my idea of health care. Health care decisions/rules in a socialized medicine system will be made primarily on cost and all health care decisions will be made according to those rules. The patient and their doctor won't be part of the decision process. In the government decisions are made totally by rules and not by a careful analysis of all factors for an individual situation.

Sunday, September 06, 2009

Pomposity

JFK said "Ask not what your country can do for you but what you can do for your country."

Obama said "Ask what you can do for Obama." I need say no more.

Thursday, March 05, 2009

Adaptable & Responsible

Adaptability creates more opportunities for life and business decisions. I doubt anyone can say that our decisions always had totally positive outcomes for ourselves and others effected. Still that's not a reason not to make those decisions. I'm talking about my actions, not my principles for which I maintain stubborn devotion with a willingness to listen to other opinions. To a great extent I'm results oriented.

I've always approached life's obstacles with a willingness to take personal responsibility and adapt to achieve results. All to many refuse to dismount a dieing horse. Even better is check the horse's condition before mounting. Adapting to the reality and practicality of life has served me well. Then we have the "Change" mantra and our government saviors. Where are their principles and common sense.

When we consider today's economic situation we can easily point fingers at deserving others. Some shouldn't forget their personal responsibility for poor financial judgement. When you assume a debt without proper planning who's the bigger fool the borrower or the lender? Does one act of stupidity justify another? Clearly Congress doesn't check the horse before mounting. A huge "stimulus" bill was passed so quickly that no one had an opportunity to read it or consider the consequences. Still the bill was passed. One must wonder if bill's are passed by Congress because of the bill's content or because of the earmarks each member of Congress is bribed with. Do they say, "I don't understand the bill but if you give me money to please my constituents and keep me in office I'll vote yes anyway?" Don't forget there were plenty of earmarks to go around. I don't consider throwing a huge pile against the wall without knowing what will stick adapting and solving the economic situation. When the tab is in the trillions, trust me isn't good enough -- I want show me.

Sunday, February 08, 2009

FOIA abuse

We all know there are strong feelings on the subject of gay marriage. My personal beliefs on the subject aren't important to this post. Abuse of the Freedom of Information Act, FOIA, for intolerance and harassment is. Eightmaps.com is a perfect example of that abuse. Those that donated to support CA Proposition 8 against gay marriage are being harassed and threatened in their homes. All because eightmaps.com used the FOIA to get donor information and Google Maps technology to identify them and their location for harassment or worse. I'm a veteran who cherishes liberty and freedom but I think this time freedom has run amok. In the intelligence community being cleared for information isn't enough. You had to demonstrate a need to know. It's time for us to consider if individual privacy shouldn't be a factor in releasing unclassified information under the FOIA. The common good would benefit from knowing the scope of support of an issue. I fail to see common good in releasing names, addresses and in this egregious case amount of donation. What an individual believes is a private issue that they can choose to share with others.

I've chosen to share my identity and opinions on some subjects openly on the Internet. These opinions are open for the reader to share. You may wonder what my opinion is on a subject I haven't shared -- that is your right to wonder. My right is privacy and that privacy shouldn't be lost because of your wonder or my choice to share that opinion with another. Sure the person I shared with may be a blabber mouth -- my bad for sharing with them. Without probable cause, as in search warrant, a person or group shouldn't be forced to evade my privacy. Wonder isn't probable cause for invasion of privacy nor is desire to harass.

Saturday, October 11, 2008

Delegation & Leadership

The key to successful delegation is to focus on the end result utilizing a team approach that doesn't mandate how tasks are done. It starts with a clear picture of the desired result, a team built schedule to achieve it and an understanding of the business goals to be met. In some instances it's a team of two -- leader and contributor. Schedules should always consist of measurable elements and for longer team efforts group milestones. No schedule is perfect but can still be successful if slips are identified early so adjustments can be made. It's most important that the expectations for the result are managed. In a well thought out plan some tasks take longer and other are done faster allowing adjustments to meet the original delivery date. There are times when meeting a schedule can be accomplished by adjusting expectations while still creating a positive result that will meet the project goals. All projects should have milestones and agreed upon due dates.

Micromanagement is the ultimate no no. There may be many ways to accomplish some tasks but only a few are flat wrong. Any contributor will zero in on one of those ways based on experience and personal preference -- it works well for them. The big beginner obstacle in team leadership is not to impose the way that is your preference. With few exceptions any method that achieves the desired result should be accepted. Some global constraints need to be applied to all for a quality result in a team effort to insure for example, a consistent user interface. Agreement on these team project rules should be negotiated up front in the development process. Contributor buy in and task ownership yield the best results.

Friday, July 18, 2008

How does one become American

  1. Be proud of and swear allegiance to American
  2. Attitude that embraces equality with unity -- not superiority or inferiority
  3. Embracing those things which are common -- knowledge, beliefs, profession, patriotism
  4. Respecting America's laws, society and values while accepting the benefits of America
  5. On occasion sharing our culture with an openness to others' cultures so that we may learn to embrace and celebrate our differences -- everybody's Irish on St. Patrick's day (green is the color of the day but there are no Irish flags)
How to fail

  1. Disrespecting American law and sovereignty -- embracing groups focused on hate and anti-Americanism
  2. Segregating one's self with language whether it be not learning English or adopting terminology that other races aren't allowed to use -- the N-word
  3. Inventing or adopting culture to exaggerate and create differences -- gangsta' lifestyle
  4. Demanding entitlements and preferences based on events that occurred long before either of us was alive -- defining one's self as victim -- abandoning personal responsibility
  5. Demanding respect without giving it -- one is only respected after first respecting others